Cummins 5.9 guys, you happy with your swap?

For everything related to converting and up keeping diesel engines in an FSJ

Topic author
pcoplin
Posts: 452
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 12:46 pm
Location: Beaverton, OR

Cummins 5.9 guys, you happy with your swap?

Post by pcoplin »

I swapped in a Dodge 5.2 into the wife's 85 Wagoneer. But been thinking of getting her a new Grand Cherokee or Durango, and takin git for myself. Do a SOA with custom front springs, 5.9 diesel, and 48RE.

You happy with the swap? Would you have done something different? Thanks!
85 Grand Wagoneer 5.2/44RE/NP229
98 TJ 5.9/46RE/D300
97 F250 Powerstroke
User avatar

Lumpskie
Posts: 1320
Joined: Wed May 14, 2014 4:33 pm
Location: New Hampshire

Re: Cummins 5.9 guys, you happy with your swap?

Post by Lumpskie »

Bump!

I'm just starting my research on swaps. I called up Aaron Reeves, who has done a number of Cummins swaps, and he steered me away from the 4bt because of massive vibration. He said that the 6bt vibrates way less and gets the same gas mileage. (mid 20s) My question is: Would the 6bt be a good option for a daily driver/tow rig application? You guys that have done the 6bt, how happy are you with your decision? (Both with picking the 6bt and deciding to go diesel in general)

Thanks for putting up with my noob questions,
1989 Grand Wagoneer - Rebuilt 360, 2" Alcans, 10" travel Gabriel Guadian shocks.
1996 Land Cruiser - 1HD-T Diesel, Gturbo (23psi), Wholesale Automatics 442f, F/R ARBs, 35" Duratracs, ARB Rear Bumper, OME 2" lift, home built sliders and aluminum belly skid
2000 Honda Civic - Integra GSR engine, transmission, shift linkage and axles, 200hp, 33 combined mpg
2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 9 - 437hp/447ft-lb

will e
Posts: 5103
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 8:21 am

Re: Cummins 5.9 guys, you happy with your swap?

Post by will e »

Well, look at how many people posted up they were happy! :)

I am a noob to diesel swaps but have seen a few include at least one 6bt. The main problem, as I understand it, is the 6bt is really heavy and to do it right you need to beef up the front suspension and frame. This may include a larger axle.

As of late the Vortec swap seems to be in fashion. I think overall it is less complicated. You get a nice powerful engine with a nice OD transmission. You would be able to tow with it and get better gas milage.
81 Waggy 'WILL E' Retired
82 Cherokee WT - SOA/SF/high steer/Alcan springs/agr box/Borgeson steering shaft/AMC 401/performer/holley TA/HEI/BeCool/727/ALTAS (2.0/2.72/5.44)/D60 Snofighter(Yukon Zip,hubs,stubs,4.56)/14 Bolt (FF,BF shave, Discs, ARB,Artec Truss)/MTR 37X12.5/Corbeau XRS Baja & 5 point retractable harness/Hella Aux lights/tuffy console/killer32 sliders/Evil Twin bumpers, rack and roll cage/WARN 8000/TT Fabworks steering brace/dual batts/custom TC skid plate/ARB fridge
User avatar

Lumpskie
Posts: 1320
Joined: Wed May 14, 2014 4:33 pm
Location: New Hampshire

Re: Cummins 5.9 guys, you happy with your swap?

Post by Lumpskie »

^This sounds interesting! Any idea on the gas mileage and availability of a 5-speed?

(I'll search the internet too)
1989 Grand Wagoneer - Rebuilt 360, 2" Alcans, 10" travel Gabriel Guadian shocks.
1996 Land Cruiser - 1HD-T Diesel, Gturbo (23psi), Wholesale Automatics 442f, F/R ARBs, 35" Duratracs, ARB Rear Bumper, OME 2" lift, home built sliders and aluminum belly skid
2000 Honda Civic - Integra GSR engine, transmission, shift linkage and axles, 200hp, 33 combined mpg
2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 9 - 437hp/447ft-lb

will e
Posts: 5103
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 8:21 am

Re: Cummins 5.9 guys, you happy with your swap?

Post by will e »

Search the site for Vortec. The results are a little cluttered but there are a couple of good build threads with A LOT of detail. I think some will include results.

We are never going to get great gas milage due to our aerodynamics.
81 Waggy 'WILL E' Retired
82 Cherokee WT - SOA/SF/high steer/Alcan springs/agr box/Borgeson steering shaft/AMC 401/performer/holley TA/HEI/BeCool/727/ALTAS (2.0/2.72/5.44)/D60 Snofighter(Yukon Zip,hubs,stubs,4.56)/14 Bolt (FF,BF shave, Discs, ARB,Artec Truss)/MTR 37X12.5/Corbeau XRS Baja & 5 point retractable harness/Hella Aux lights/tuffy console/killer32 sliders/Evil Twin bumpers, rack and roll cage/WARN 8000/TT Fabworks steering brace/dual batts/custom TC skid plate/ARB fridge
User avatar

Lumpskie
Posts: 1320
Joined: Wed May 14, 2014 4:33 pm
Location: New Hampshire

Re: Cummins 5.9 guys, you happy with your swap?

Post by Lumpskie »

^Awesome. I'll check that out.

I'm not looking for incredible gas mileage, but 20mpg on a motor that could tow 5000 lbs without sweating would really make me happy!
1989 Grand Wagoneer - Rebuilt 360, 2" Alcans, 10" travel Gabriel Guadian shocks.
1996 Land Cruiser - 1HD-T Diesel, Gturbo (23psi), Wholesale Automatics 442f, F/R ARBs, 35" Duratracs, ARB Rear Bumper, OME 2" lift, home built sliders and aluminum belly skid
2000 Honda Civic - Integra GSR engine, transmission, shift linkage and axles, 200hp, 33 combined mpg
2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 9 - 437hp/447ft-lb
User avatar

Mudbull
Posts: 131
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:07 pm
Location: Lakeland, FL

Re: Cummins 5.9 guys, you happy with your swap?

Post by Mudbull »

Im a big fan of the LS engine, but for me i wouldn't want anything but a Cummins in my truck; im planning on doing another conversion hopefully in the near future. The thing with diesels, if your towing a lot, is that your fuel mileage doesn't drop off as quickly as in a gas truck. In my donor Ram I was getting 15-17mpg towing 5000lbs. In my Kaiser not towing anything im getting 20-23mpg easy.

The cummins is a very heavy engine (~1200lbs), you would need to reinforce the front end and get something like a dana 60 for the front. It isn't a light duty engine that was thought up for the consumer market, its a heavy duty diesel engine. With that being said, it is not the most refined of rides-its loud under the hood (mechanical noises, injectors...) and rattles worse than any v8 at idle.

For an easy swap that will be good around town you may want to just go with an LS, let me know if you have any other questions.
68' Gladiator
p-pumped Cummins
6spd, D60 Front, D80 Rear
User avatar

243
Posts: 740
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 7:32 am
Location: Texas

Re: Cummins 5.9 guys, you happy with your swap?

Post by 243 »

I never had a 12V but two 24V's for about 6 years, loved them both.

The pigs were just hell on the D60 ball joints, track bar and to a lesser degree tie rods, I would not want any less than a D60...

I will be happy with an LS in my Chero but that smooth and quiet 12V is TEMPTING!
1978 Cherokee NT, 5.3/4L60/NP241 in Progress
User avatar

The PIG Smith
Posts: 507
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 10:54 pm
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana

Re: Cummins 5.9 guys, you happy with your swap?

Post by The PIG Smith »

Everyone I know and have spoken to have loved their Cummins 6BT and 4BT swaps.
However, I do know of some folks that Diesel is not for them.

Tad told me once when I asked him about SOA for one of my rigs, that I need to ride and then drive in a SOA rig before I decide if that is way I wanna go.
He went on to say that SOA rigs are not for everyone.

Same advice applies to Diesel swaps.
They are not for everyone.
Bryan Smith
Fort Wayne, Indiana
2017 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited
- 75th Anniversary Edition - 1941 Trim Package - Recon Green --Daily Driver
1986 Jeep J20
- Super clean rig from the AZ/CA state line -- Current Project
1982 Jeep J10
- Has become a Long Term Project.
1981 Jeep J20
- Commercial flat bed - Lost in a Divorce --gone
1987 Jeep J20 Pioneer
- Former Rick Bielec aka Ricbee plow rig. Major rust!! --gone

IFSJA Member #1933 Joined November 30, 2001
User avatar

243
Posts: 740
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 7:32 am
Location: Texas

Re: Cummins 5.9 guys, you happy with your swap?

Post by 243 »

Put me in the love diesels crowd, I don't mind the smell of raw diesel and far prefer diesel exhaust to gasoline exhaust.

My wife used to complain I didn't pay enough attention to her, I said, "put a dab 'o diesel behind your ears", she was not amused...and she is my EX now :D
1978 Cherokee NT, 5.3/4L60/NP241 in Progress
User avatar

Lumpskie
Posts: 1320
Joined: Wed May 14, 2014 4:33 pm
Location: New Hampshire

Re: Cummins 5.9 guys, you happy with your swap?

Post by Lumpskie »

So, you guys, I've got another noob question for you on the subject. I understand why you need to beef up the front springs for the 6bt but why do you need a beefier axle up front? Wouldn't the torque from the motor be loading the rear axle?
1989 Grand Wagoneer - Rebuilt 360, 2" Alcans, 10" travel Gabriel Guadian shocks.
1996 Land Cruiser - 1HD-T Diesel, Gturbo (23psi), Wholesale Automatics 442f, F/R ARBs, 35" Duratracs, ARB Rear Bumper, OME 2" lift, home built sliders and aluminum belly skid
2000 Honda Civic - Integra GSR engine, transmission, shift linkage and axles, 200hp, 33 combined mpg
2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 9 - 437hp/447ft-lb
User avatar

Gumby
Posts: 1433
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:20 am
Location: Tucson, AZ

Re: Cummins 5.9 guys, you happy with your swap?

Post by Gumby »

Lumpskie wrote:So, you guys, I've got another noob question for you on the subject. I understand why you need to beef up the front springs for the 6bt but why do you need a beefier axle up front? Wouldn't the torque from the motor be loading the rear axle?
I love my diesel and if the gods permit I too would do a swap only with the CRD though, they idle and vibrate much less. About the axle, have you ever seen one of those power wheels after the big kids drive them too much? Same result with the Cummins in a "light" vehicle like a FSJ.

This swap is not for everyone but it is one he'll of an improvement if you do it right.
1984 GW 360/727/208.... 4"/ 31"
2004 CRD QC SRW 3500 4X4 (DD)
1983 "project Dubya" (long term)

will e
Posts: 5103
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 8:21 am

Re: Cummins 5.9 guys, you happy with your swap?

Post by will e »

It's the physical weight of the engine that the front axle is trying to support that will be the issue.
81 Waggy 'WILL E' Retired
82 Cherokee WT - SOA/SF/high steer/Alcan springs/agr box/Borgeson steering shaft/AMC 401/performer/holley TA/HEI/BeCool/727/ALTAS (2.0/2.72/5.44)/D60 Snofighter(Yukon Zip,hubs,stubs,4.56)/14 Bolt (FF,BF shave, Discs, ARB,Artec Truss)/MTR 37X12.5/Corbeau XRS Baja & 5 point retractable harness/Hella Aux lights/tuffy console/killer32 sliders/Evil Twin bumpers, rack and roll cage/WARN 8000/TT Fabworks steering brace/dual batts/custom TC skid plate/ARB fridge
User avatar

tndonor
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 2:55 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Cummins 5.9 guys, you happy with your swap?

Post by tndonor »

Ive had two FSJ Cummins rigs.

My first was a 1980 J10 with a 4B. The only time they vibrate more IMO is on shutdown. Of the dozen or so conversions I have been around, the "vibration" issue came from motor mounting choices. I used a hydraulic isolating mount. It vibrated no worse than the 6.2 GM Diesel that was in the J truck before that.

My current truck is a M715 with a 6B. It doesnt really vibrate but is loud as the military trucks are single pane metal everything. No sound dampening. Its also sprung over, has 39 inch tires, etc so Engine vibration was never on my radar so to say.

Most people who dont like the Diesel dont have needs/goals that Diesel will fullfill. Putting one in just because or thats what the cools kids are doing will disappoint everytime. Perhaps posting what you hope to accomplish with a powertrain swap and both sides of this coin can chime in and lend some more pointed informaiton and advice.
1967 Jeep M715. Cummins HX35/HT3B NV4500 203/205 Doubler. HP60/14B. OBW. OBA.
Ive done my part to jump start the economy
User avatar

Lumpskie
Posts: 1320
Joined: Wed May 14, 2014 4:33 pm
Location: New Hampshire

Re: Cummins 5.9 guys, you happy with your swap?

Post by Lumpskie »

I see what you're saying about the weight of the engine... that just never occured to me! (I come from an import vehicle background and I hand carried the Acura motor for my last swap!)

I'd love to hear more opinions on what you guys suggest for a swap, but don't want to clutter this thread. So, I'll start another one. Post over there and give me all your opinions and experiences!
1989 Grand Wagoneer - Rebuilt 360, 2" Alcans, 10" travel Gabriel Guadian shocks.
1996 Land Cruiser - 1HD-T Diesel, Gturbo (23psi), Wholesale Automatics 442f, F/R ARBs, 35" Duratracs, ARB Rear Bumper, OME 2" lift, home built sliders and aluminum belly skid
2000 Honda Civic - Integra GSR engine, transmission, shift linkage and axles, 200hp, 33 combined mpg
2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 9 - 437hp/447ft-lb

Iceman0502
Posts: 65
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 6:32 pm

Re: Cummins 5.9 guys, you happy with your swap?

Post by Iceman0502 »

Ford used Dana 44's under thier 7.3 diesel 3/4 ton trucks back in the 90s, maybe early 90's. They were full width 69"ish and equiped with 8 lugs and bigger brakes.

Waggoneer axles are narrow width so i would think it is less span to bend and can be converted to 8 lug with big brakes.

Aren't Dana 44 ball joints all the same and it doesnt matter the vehicle manufacturer??

There are still untouched ford diesels driving around with original ball joints.


Also J20's are considered 3/4 ton trucks. They use a front Dana 44 front which is the same as J10 D44. J10/20 front springs could have front springs with a load rating or 1400 lbs each (total 2800 lbs). Stock wagoneer springs are 960 lbs each (total 1920 lbs). Thats a difference of 880 lbs, which is about the difference from the stock 360 (600 lbs?) to a 6BT (1200 lbs?).

Just think about how many J10/20s are driving around with plow mounts and overhead racks, etc. Also chevy put a 10 bolt under thier 3/4 ton suburbans with 6.2 diesels.

I personally think the Dana 44 would hold up for daily driving, towing, camping activities. Something larger will be necessary for offroading.
User avatar

tndonor
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 2:55 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Cummins 5.9 guys, you happy with your swap?

Post by tndonor »

As far as weight... I only know the Cummins side of things.

A 4B is about 750 pounds, a 6B just south of 1200 pounds. If you add a bumper, winch, etc......it adds up quick. Larger front axle is to adequately support the weight more than it sends the power to the rear.
1967 Jeep M715. Cummins HX35/HT3B NV4500 203/205 Doubler. HP60/14B. OBW. OBA.
Ive done my part to jump start the economy
User avatar

husker77
Posts: 753
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 9:13 pm
Location: Glenvil, Nebraska

Re: Cummins 5.9 guys, you happy with your swap?

Post by husker77 »

Iceman0502 wrote:Ford used Dana 44's under thier 7.3 diesel 3/4 ton trucks back in the 90s, maybe early 90's. They were full width 69"ish and equiped with 8 lugs and bigger brakes.
I am not positive but anything with the diesel would be a f250 or f350. The f250's would have a ttb dana 50 under the front, the outers are the same(or close to) as dana 60's. Any f350 would be a dana 60, except for a few I think had dana 50's.

Iceman0502
Posts: 65
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 6:32 pm

Re: Cummins 5.9 guys, you happy with your swap?

Post by Iceman0502 »

I guess besides the choice of axle.

What did everyone do with there registration? Is it worth changing gas to diesel? or becuase most of these trucks are before OBD2 does it even matter with no emissions? Keep the gas registration and drive the diesel?
User avatar

tndonor
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 2:55 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Cummins 5.9 guys, you happy with your swap?

Post by tndonor »

Registration is largely a function of where you live. Check your local laws regarding engine swaps, emissions, etc. There is no panacea answer unfortunately. It can even vary within a county
1967 Jeep M715. Cummins HX35/HT3B NV4500 203/205 Doubler. HP60/14B. OBW. OBA.
Ive done my part to jump start the economy
Post Reply