Shock Mount Modification for Longer Shocks

Area for Offroad Modification Tech
Post Reply

Topic author
Steelhorse
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 6:33 pm

Shock Mount Modification for Longer Shocks

Post by Steelhorse »

hey guys - trying out the whole thread copy thing. Stealing this from Dr Bob...seeing how I own the Jeep now I'm sure he won't mind the copyright infringement! A great mod for anyone looking to gain some shock travel and articulation :-bd

Well, the shock-mount hole on the shock-bracket has to be enlarged, but aside from that, no cutting or machining required!

Image

I can now use all 14" of travel that the shocks afford; that is, if I can get the springs to flex that much...

Image

I made up a web-page detailing the install (not that there is much to detail about it):

http://www.drbob.tqhosting.com/cherokee/shock.htm

------
Originally posted by youngjeeper:
i cant see from any of the shots you took. but is the shock going to hit the spring plate/spring when you flex? that is the problem i am having now. i notched the spring plates and moving tower mount forward.
I flipped my front-springs, so my axle sits about 3" further forward that stock, and the shock sits almost completely behind the spring-plate, so there is no interference, even when I've got it drooped to the max.
I guess it is sort of a misnomer to say this is a "bolt-on" upgrade. It works perfect for a truck that has a Dodge D60 front axle installed 3" forward of its stock location, but might not as easily for others. So I'll simply say it was a bolt-on FOR ME.

------

With the Sky Manufacturing high-steer arm on the D60, the drag-link is almost parallel with the original tie-rod, even with the axle moved forward 3", not only when viewed from the front, but also when viewed from the top:

Image

You can kind of see that as well in the lower right-hand corner of this shot:

Image

As you can see, there's little chance of the drag-link hitting the tie-rod

Image

There might be a problem if I moved the tie-rod up over the springs and used a steering-arm on the driver's-side knuckle as well, in which case a shorter pitman arm would probably resolve the issue.

------

I'm using the stock-length pitman arm and the regular-length Sky Mfg. high-steer arm on the passenger-side only, with the tie-rod in the stock location. I'll only mount that up high as well if I find myself bending the tie-rod. Then I'll look into a shorter arm, but I wouldn't need it to be 2" shorter; something 1" shorter should do the trick.

wag4x6
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 9:45 pm

Re: Shock Mount Modification for Longer Shocks

Post by wag4x6 »

I've found when using the F250 shock mounts on a stock D44 with a SOA the spring plate crushes the shock a full flex, thus killing the shock.
89 Gwag, stock 360, stock 727, np229, d44 front/rear, SOA/SF on 35's

Hellride
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 7:08 am

Re: Shock Mount Modification for Longer Shocks

Post by Hellride »

Ive done pretty much the same thing. F250 shock towers. about $14 each from the dealer. drilled a couple holes in my frame and bolted them back a few inches with 14" bilstein 7100's. They are connected to the factory shock mounts on my chevy dana 60.

Image
Post Reply