Let me put things this way--I KNOW for a fact that that's how it works on my dad's Mustang. That may not be how it applies here, but that IS how that one works. Probably a computer thing.tgreese wrote: ↑Sun Apr 16, 2023 11:50 am No, it does not work like that. The electrochemical potential of the lead-acid cells is 12.6 volts. The battery has an internal resistance which creates a voltage by Ohm's law when charging; voltage equal current times resistance. These voltages add. The voltage regulator is just that; it acts to regulate the charging voltage of the battery. That regulated voltage should not exceed about 14 volts, even if the battery is completely flat.
The charging current goes up and down in response to the load and the condition of the battery. The feedback is by voltage, acting on the internal resistance of the battery. The voltage regulator maintains that voltage at a constant value.
But you said in your previous post that it "should not exceed 14 volts." Either it's an imprecise system that's going to sit wherever, and as long as it's charging the battery w/o blowing it up, it's probably ok, or it needs to be around a certain number. You're claiming both sides of an either or and I don't understand. I agree with your second statement that it's imprecise but not your first that it HAS to be at or below 14 volts.tgreese wrote: ↑Mon Apr 17, 2023 6:44 am You're right that what you observe on a modern car may or may not be relevant to these cars. Computer control was not a thing in 1984, and many systems on that Mustang will not work without central computer control. Just like EFI, you can make complex responses with digital lookup tables that were only possible in 1984 with many layers of mechanical control. Witness all the stuff needed to make a carburetor emissions compliant, for example.
What bothers you about this, that the system in practice is not as exact as my description, or my description of how it works?
The voltage regulator is basically an analog computer with a single input and output. Whatever the manual says about its operating voltage is correct. If you look at the circuit, it's controlled by a few transistors connected to a zener diode voltage reference. The knee of an inexpensive zener is broad, and it gives varying pass voltages in reverse depending on the applied voltage. You've also got a long ways to go to get a response, with a third-party battery of inexact construction as the main scaling element. Seems likely there's a tradeoff between precise regulation and cost, and if precision were not needed, cost could be lowered.
Awesome info, do you by chance have a link to the part you bought to remedy this?will e wrote: ↑Mon Apr 17, 2023 9:40 am I fought charging issues for a while on my 83 cherokee. I was planning on a CS140 upgrade but wanted to make sure the current system was working. Mine was a bit intermittent. Sometimes 14.2 volts, sometimes whatever the battery was at. Sometimes a bit in between.
While troubleshooting I finally discovered the 'exciter' wire, which was a single strand resistor wire in my jeep, had cracked and 'broken' due to age. I guess sometimes it wold complete the connection and other times it would not.
So, when I did the cs140 upgrade I purchased a connector with the resistor and bypassed the original resistor wire. My issues are all gone.
You can test yours by removing the plug and checking for voltage at the connector (not the alternator) when the ignition is turned to the 'on' position. The engine does not need to be running.
Sure:AlexJordan22 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 17, 2023 10:53 amAwesome info, do you by chance have a link to the part you bought to remedy this?will e wrote: ↑Mon Apr 17, 2023 9:40 am I fought charging issues for a while on my 83 cherokee. I was planning on a CS140 upgrade but wanted to make sure the current system was working. Mine was a bit intermittent. Sometimes 14.2 volts, sometimes whatever the battery was at. Sometimes a bit in between.
While troubleshooting I finally discovered the 'exciter' wire, which was a single strand resistor wire in my jeep, had cracked and 'broken' due to age. I guess sometimes it wold complete the connection and other times it would not.
So, when I did the cs140 upgrade I purchased a connector with the resistor and bypassed the original resistor wire. My issues are all gone.
You can test yours by removing the plug and checking for voltage at the connector (not the alternator) when the ignition is turned to the 'on' position. The engine does not need to be running.
Alternator was installed about 4 months ago and has worked well up until a couple days ago. You're clearly really knowledgeable about the charging system, does this sound like an internal problem with the alternator? I'm assuming the alternator is internally regulated but could be wrong.tgreese wrote: ↑Mon Aug 07, 2023 8:58 am The regulator controls the voltage and has transistors and a zener voltage reference in it. The alternator is just a bunch of wire and steel plus some silicon diodes.
The regulator regulates in response to the sense wire; that's other wire on the plug with the exciter. Normally that's connected to the charge wire, which is always at battery voltage. The regulator feeds back current to the windings in the alternator to make current. The alternator makes enough current so the battery voltage is always the set point, like 13.5-14 volts. This compensates for the variable load, and for any drained battery potential from starting.
No "wants" or "appears" about it - don't imagine how it might work. A new alternator could be bad, and the regulator is part of it. Napa parts are usually pretty good.