...and more proof that Buick V-8s are awesome

Area for General NON-Jeep related chat. Topics are typically not moderated, but must fall within the Use Guidelines.
Post Reply

Topic author
sierrablue
Posts: 1208
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2022 8:02 pm
Location: MN/CO

...and more proof that Buick V-8s are awesome

Post by sierrablue »

I realize it's not the 350, but still...I actually debated putting one of these in mine, as it has the nailhead pattern tranny anyway, and then I could tell people I had a 401 :-bd :lol:

https://www.thesr71blackbird.com/Aircra ... start-cart
'71 Wagoneer (DD)
-B350 (HEI, iron 4-barrel, Edelbrock 1406), TH400, D20
-'74 D44 front (nonpower discs)
-custom headliner
-Front shoulder belts (rears eventually)

viewtopic.php?t=23070

There are 2 major differences between new Wranglers and FSJs. FSJs are meant to be both utilitarian and capable, not just capable. FSJs are also rarely initially recognized as Jeeps by the average American.
User avatar

Yeller
Posts: 1529
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2021 7:54 am
Location: Rogers County Oklahoma

Re: ...and more proof that Buick V-8s are awesome

Post by Yeller »

That’s some cool history😎
The bus I ride is so short it is a yellow Smart Car full of squirrels, monkeys and clowns.

1970 J2500 Resto Mod
https://www.fsjnetwork.com/forum/viewt ... 12&t=21395

1974 Bronco “Broncno”
https://classicbroncos.com/forums/threa ... st-3411909
User avatar

tgreese
Posts: 7169
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 6:31 am
Location: Medford MA USA

Re: ...and more proof that Buick V-8s are awesome

Post by tgreese »

The nailheads were fine engines in their day. However, I suspect the SR-71 crew used whatever engines were available and powerful enough. Cool looking engine - the upright valve covers are distinctive and great looking in an open-bay hot rod. They are old... and generally the older an engine is, the more expensive it is to rebuild.

These carts must have originalted in the '60s? The military could have bought whatever engines they want for these carts - suspect they were bought as new commodity engines from Buick, just like Kaiser bought the 350. Maybe that's what Buick could offer at the time.

If you want something wilder in your Wagoneer, I believe the larger Buicks (400, 430, 455) will drop on to your mounts and bolt up to the existing adapter ring. There's also the 472, 500 Cadillac, which is powerful, compact and lightweight for its displacement, and bolts up to the adapter ring though the mounts are different. IIRC it fits the engine compartment better than the Buick. Look through the archives at IFSJA for some examples.
Tim Reese
Maine beekeeper's truck: '77 J10 LWB, 258/T15/D20/3.54 bone stock, low options (delete radio), PS/PDB, hubcaps.
Browless and proud: '82 J20 360/T18/NP208/3.73, Destination A/Ts, 7600 GVWR
Copper Polly: '75 CJ-6, 304/T15, PS, BFG KM2s, soft top
GTI without the badges: '95 VW Golf Sport 2000cc 2D
Dual Everything: '15 Chryco Jeep Cherokee KL Trailhawk, ECO Green
Blockchain the vote.

Topic author
sierrablue
Posts: 1208
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2022 8:02 pm
Location: MN/CO

Re: ...and more proof that Buick V-8s are awesome

Post by sierrablue »

I can already smoke the tires; Idk why I'd put more power in; that would merely suck more gas. I have non-power brakes so the brake booster wouldn't be a problem, but the nailheads are about 1" taller, which would interfere with the heater core.

I know the SR-71 originated in '62ish. According to what I read, the Buicks were a thing in the '60s, and then in the '70s they switched to the 454 and stuck with that. The Buick is cooler though, imo.
'71 Wagoneer (DD)
-B350 (HEI, iron 4-barrel, Edelbrock 1406), TH400, D20
-'74 D44 front (nonpower discs)
-custom headliner
-Front shoulder belts (rears eventually)

viewtopic.php?t=23070

There are 2 major differences between new Wranglers and FSJs. FSJs are meant to be both utilitarian and capable, not just capable. FSJs are also rarely initially recognized as Jeeps by the average American.
Post Reply